<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Letter Never Sent - Latest Comments in Prehistoric giants | Letter Never Sent</title><link>http://letterneversent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:46:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Prehistoric giants | Letter Never Sent</title><link>http://www.letterneversent.com/prehistoric-giants/2169/#comment-1385579</link><description>This program purports to answer you:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/thematerialworld_20040212.shtml"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/thematerial...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole discussion is on suggested evolutionary pressures which drove the appearance of the sauropods and the associated large carnivores. The reason why similar pressures haven't developed in the Cenozoic, however, isn't explicitly addressed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, isn't there a similar proliferation of large animals today? Elephants are rougly the same size as a T-rex, and blue whales are bigger than the sauropods.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kent</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>