<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Letter Never Sent - Latest Comments in Digital Cameras | Letter Never Sent</title><link>http://letterneversent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:36:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Digital Cameras | Letter Never Sent</title><link>http://www.letterneversent.com/digital-cameras/1514/#comment-1384426</link><description>Which are you looking at?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Cameras | Letter Never Sent</title><link>http://www.letterneversent.com/digital-cameras/1514/#comment-1384427</link><description>I’ve been looking at cameras recently as well.  One thing I’ve found is that fewer and fewer cameras are using the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries and instead using AAs.  This sucks.  Decide which you would prefer, and if you pick the lithium-ions then that should greatly narrow your search.  Also, unless you can honestly think of a good reason to have more than 4 or 5 megapixels, there is not much reason to pay for more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">breen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>